touch = love ?

psychologist harry harlow did some amazing experiments in the 50s where infant monkeys were allowed to choose between surrogate lactating mothers made of soft or hard materials (pictured) and they inevitably chose the softer cloth mothers, even though both surrogates produced milk. monkeys who could see their real mothers, but not touch them, developed social disorders. can it be better to touch a virtual mother than to communicate purely visually with a real mother? wow. read his ‘on the nature of love’ here>

This entry was posted in livingbreathing, perception. Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

One Comment